Home » Debt cancellation and reparations

Debt cancellation and reparations

by gwcmag

The G20 announced within the same month, the Debt Service Suspension Initiative which involves simply a delay of debt service due from 1 May 2020 to 31 December 2020.


Countries eligible to apply only include those in the list of the World Bank’s International Development Agency (IDA) and the United Nations’ list of Least Developed Countries – a total of 76 countries.

The amount of debt service to be suspended if all eligible countries apply and all G20 countries participate is only about USD$11 billion.

The G20 offer only covers 3.65 percent of all the debt service payments to be made in 2020 by developing countries. It must be noted that the debt service being canceled and/or suspended are only those to be paid to official creditors. Nearly half of public external debt is owed to private lenders.


Many campaigns and movements – south and north – are calling for deeper, wider cancelation of public debt payments for a much bigger number of countries, and for a longer period of at least four years, as an immediate response to the pandemic and the economic crisis. 

The campaigners also want decisive steps to be taken for more comprehensive and lasting solutions to the debt problem, including the total and unconditional cancelation of outstanding debt stock and changes in the international financial architecture and borrowing and lending policies to prevent the re-accumulation of debt.

One of the key obstacles to debt solutions is how a debt crisis or debt distress is defined.

For a long time creditors have held the view that there is a global debt crisis when many countries are not making their debt payments in full and on time. And countries are in debt distress if they are experiencing difficulties in servicing their debts.

From the perspective and experience of peoples of the South – we have been in a permanent debt crisis.

This means debt payments continue to occupy a significant share of public spending and prioritised over vital needs such as basic services and economic policies that promote social justice, address poverty and inequality.

More over, it prevents the debtor countries from building climate resilience and addressing loss and damage associated with climate change harms, and paving the way for equitable and post carbon development.


Debt injustice is more than the impact on public spending for the well-being and rights of people and communities, and more than the economic vulnerability to exogenous shocks.

Loans, access to credit and debt relief have long been used as leverage to impose policy conditionalities, and this practice continues in various guises.

The impact of many of these conditionalities, including tight austerity measures and privatisation of essential services, are just as worse if not even worse than the debt problem.

Many debts peddled by lenders and incurred by governments in the name of their people were not actually used for the real benefit of people and many loan-financed projects have actually been harmful for communities and the environment.

And yet these illegitimate debts are paid using peoples’ money.


Calls to address illegitimate debts as a priority must be renewed.

At the same time, the debt problem must be seen from a broader and historical view, in order to pave the way for strategic, just, fair and long lasting solutions.

The problem of debt is a consequence of a long history of colonial and neo-colonial plunder of the resources and wealth of the South.

It is not a coincidence that the first lenders to most southern countries were their colonisers, purportedly as part of the assistance and solutions to the impoverishment in the South.

And this justification to massive lending and borrowing continues to this day through international financial institutions that continue the same work.


We are incapable of generating wealth as so much of our countries’ wealth – natural resources as well as wealth generated by our hardworking people – leaves our countries.

It is taken to the North in the form of illicit financial flows, capital flight, profit repatriation, interest payments on unsustainable and illegitimate debts, losses from underpriced exports and overpriced imports and unfair trade relations.

And the wealth that stays inside our countries is mostly controlled by elites and big corporations.

This is borne by hard facts – on balance, there is a net outflow of resources from the south to the north. This requires structural reparations for Southern nations. 


One of the biggest myths that continue to be perpetuated is that we lack wealth and capital.

This justifies the overzealous pursuit of loans on the part of many Southern governments, and the supply driven lending, unfair trade arrangements, and invasion of our economies and markets by northern and international elites, their financial institutions and their corporations.

We must fight for just debt cancellations – but also for reparations. For the historical social, economic, ecological and climate debt owed to our people.

And we must wage this fight as part of a broader struggle to transform the fundamentally flawed system that has been built on and perpetuated injustice and inequality in various dimensions, while devastating our people and our planet.

This Author

Lidy Nacpil is a coordinator for Asian Peoples’ Movement On Debt And Development, based in Manila, Philippines.

Source link

Related Posts

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Subscribe to our Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos.
Let's stay updated!