A successful rewilding project could bring back some lost species nearing extinction – such as beavers, cranes, sea eagles and pine martens happen slowly, while elk and lynx are among the species already made extinct.
However, conversations around rewilding have always been tricky for the Scottish population. On social media, where such issues are likely to be discussed, a lack of tolerance for different perspectives is enhanced.
Entrenched, impassioned opinions from all sides can cause separation. Rather than allowing issues to be explored, nuance to be understood and common ground found, these platforms so often seem to polarise the discussion and exaggerate differences.
Arranged by interest groups, the report explores attitudes towards rewilding among farmers, field sports enthusiasts, landowners, rural communities, conservation bodies, and the general public, seeking to understand the sources of conflict and make recommendations on how to reconcile differing perspectives.
Barriers to the acceptance of rewilding by farmers include concerns over how a ‘rewilded’ landscape works economically and the potential loss of traditional farming practices.
There is also fear amongst farmers as to how the introduction of ‘keystone species’ such as wolves and lynx could threaten livestock. Lambs getting preyed on by the reintroduction of the sea eagle confirmed many farmers’ fears.
Yet farmers and rewilders both want and need a healthy environment and thriving rural communities. Although some angling enthusiasts might prioritise catch numbers, everyone shares a common interest in clean, healthy river systems.
Cairns adds: “We believe there is much more common ground than is currently portrayed in the popular media, and much to be gained from demystifying rewilding, fostering a more mutually respectful debate, and highlighting the benefits that large-scale nature recovery offers to everyone.
“We don’t pretend to have all the answers to what is a complex issue. However, it does provide a springboard for building bridges leading to a more considered, progressive, and inclusive conversation about how Scotland’s landscapes could function better to benefit nature, climate, and people.”
More needs to be done to help different groups navigate the changes rewilding could bring, and recognize the opportunities relevant to their interests if it is to gain wider support across the groups considered.
Some resistance to rewilding undoubtedly results from its uncertain outcomes, but it could offer the best chance to mitigate many of the scary challenges we have already precipitated through climate breakdown, from which there is arguably much more to fear.
The Heart and Minds report was written by Dr. Hugh Webster, an independent conservationist & freelance writer interested in rewilding, environmental education & human-wildlife conflict. The report was published by Scottland: The Big Picture.