Does Height Matter in Rock Climbing?|The Climbing Guy – GWC Mag



It’s common to hear a climbing buddy holding forth about their diminutive stature and how it’s putting them at a disadvantage.

All too often a route they’ve been struggling with for the past half an hour is a walk in the park for their 6’ 2” mate, which is often followed by a lot of cursing and claims of an unfair advantage.

But does being tall really offer that much advantage and vice versa, does being short really hold peoples climbing back?


The long and short of it is (ba dum tss), that height just doesn’t have anything like as much of an impact on climbing ability as weight and technique do.


It’s power to weight ratio and technique that really makes the difference. When we look at the data, it’s actually the case that the majority of the top climbers are little below average height. So, quit moaning and get climbing!

Ok, so let’s break it down a bit more and look at this from both side.

Being Taller Means A Longer Reach

This is an unassailable truth, there is no getting away from the fact that taller people are able to reach further, which means for a given body position, there are more options open to them.

It’s also worth pointing out that this applies to arms and legs, the latter often being overlooked. This compounds the benefit, as longer legs provide a larger base, from which those lengthier arms can then be leveraged.

Of course, the Ape Index is a consideration here. This is the ratio of your height/reach (index finger to index finger). Whilst the norm is an index of 1, the same as your height.

It’s entirely possible for it to vary either way, potentially causing someone of a greater height to have a shorter reach, or it can also go the other way, which can be a genuine advantage.

It’s not all sunshine and roses!

Compact or scrunched up moves are just plain harder.

Imagine a situation where you need to get really high feet, in order to make the next move, it’s clearly going to be harder when your knees are around your ears.

It’s also worth pointing out that longer limbs are going to be harder to keep on the wall on steep ground. That extra leverage is going to require greater core strength to stop the feet cutting free.

So, reach is a definite advantage, but those extra-long limbs are not without their down sides.

Bigger Climbers are Stronger

In absolute terms, yes, for the most part.

A larger frame, is going to be equipped with larger muscles and so greater absolute strength, particularly in an untrained climber.

Again, this is not without its challenges, the most obvious one being all that extra weight.

More mass = more weight and whilst strength generally grows with size, it does so at a slower rate than weight. That is to say, as you get bigger, your weight grows faster than your relative strength.

This hits those tall guys and gals where it really hurts, power to weight ratio.

The top climbers, as we’ll see in a bit, vary in size a fair bit, but the most glaring metric that stands out is their weight. For the most part, all of them are light, really bloody light, particularly for their height.

So Are There Any Benefits of Being A Smaller Climber

We’ve already touched on the inverse of this, bigger people are generally heavier, so smaller people are generally lighter.

This is a big advantage, particularly as climbers mature into the intermediate levels and beyond.

People with a smaller skeletal structure are able to achieve a lower overall body weight. With the right training over time, they’re able to get light and strong, which is where we all want to be.

This is perhaps why many of the top-flight climbers are slightly below the average height. Once technique and minimum weight are achieved, the smaller frames can get a lighter lowest weight, hence edging up the power to weight.

It’s Easier to Position a Smaller Frame

This is also worth bearing in mind, that a smaller frame is able to be positioned in more cramped and contorted positions.

This is certainly a benefit when thrutching up some horrendous narrow chimney. Having less limbs to co-ordinate and a generally smaller frame are likely to be of benefit.

So far, it’s certainly not quite as clear cut as you may have thought.

What does the data tell us?

Elite Level Climbers Are Below Average Height

I took an extract of data from the top 100 climbers over the past 12 months from 8a.nu, and looked at their vital statistics. Whilst I can’t make any assessment as to the veracity of the data, it ought to be fine for our purposes.

I did this for both males and females and then removed any entries that didn’t have their height or weight available, which was a fair few unfortunately.

It’s worth noting, that the UK and USA average height for males is 175 cm and 177 cm respectively. When compared to the average for the top flight male climbers we have data for, they’re slightly under average, at 173 cm.

The women’s national average is 161 cm for the UK and 162 cm for the USA, which is pretty much bang on for the sample of female climbers.

Both groups showed a significant variance around these averages, with the males ranging from 146 cm to 189 cm and the females ranging from 139 cm to 178 cm.

Here’s the data tables I pulled together.

Elite Male Climbers Height and Weight Statistics

Rank Name CM KG
1 Adam Ondra 185 68
2 Piotr Schab 173 58
3 Jonathan Siegrist 167 58
4 Daniel Fuertes 169 58
5 Mathieu Bouyoud 180 63
6 Jorge Diaz-Rullo 169 58
8 Luis Rodriguez Martin 170 58
9 Rafa Fanega 163 58
10 Stefan Scarperi 170 53
12 Lukasz Dudek 176 63
13 Mateusz Haladaj 174 58
14 Luca Bana 170 58
15 Alexander Rohr 180 63
16 Moritz Welt 176 63
17 Matteo Menardi 170 63
18 Joe Kinder 173 68
19 KYMY DE LA PEÑA 167 63
20 Jernej Kruder 180 68
21 Philipp Gaßner 176 68
22 Andrea Zanone 180 63
23 Jakub Kováčik 174 68
25 Moritz Perwitzschky 182 78
26 Hugo Parmentier 167 58
27 Guillaume Lebret 170 63
28 Manu Lopez 165 58
29 Jose Agustí 174 63
30 Nico Ferlitsch 181 68
31 Thomas Blaabjerg 185 68
34 Thomas Dauser 171 63
35 Thibault Lair 169 63
36 Dalton Bunker 175 68
37 Jim Pope 146 43
38 Urs Moosmüller 175 63
39 Alberto Gotta 170 63
41 Jakob Bizjak 183 73
42 Alberto Gines Lopez 169 58
43 Hernan Garcia 168 48
44 Laurent Hogan 177 73
45 André Neres 172 63
46 Alex Garriga 172 53
47 Lucas De Jesus Martin 167 53
50 Filip Schenk 170 63
51 Iris Matamoros Quero 180 68
52 David Martinez Lorden 176 63
53 Matteo Gambaro 170 58
55 Luke Dawson 168 68
56 Christian Münch 172 58
57 Wojtek Pełka 166 53
58 Pietro Biagini 175 68
59 Alessandro Larcher 178 68
60 Dan Beland 165 53
62 Vonarburg Nicola 167 58
64 Stefan Madej 185 68
65 Paul Steinig 167 53
66 Kieran Forrest 163 48
67 Denis Pail 162 58
68 Mumin Karabas 178 63
69 Matthias Schiestl 166 63
70 Iuri Reusa 179 68
72 Michael Schreiber 182 73
75 Thomas P. O’Halloran 180 68
76 Rapha Fernandez 178 68
79 Rafal Porebski 185 68
81 Clemens Berger 170 58
83 Ricardo Vara 175 68
84 Alejandro Bada 174 63
85 Konstantin Savelyev 175 68
86 Julien BM 180 73
87 Poli Olivares 168 63
89 Roland Wagner 167 58
90 Jonas Häring 189 73
91 Jaka Šprah 175 63
93 Maciej Dobrzański 170 63
95 Octavio Hernandez 175 63
97 Walker Emerson 189 83
98 Kajtek Pawelec 171 53

Elite Female Climbers Height and Weight Statistics

Ranking Name CM KG
122 Manon Hily 155 48
132 Martina Harnisch 166 58
137 Angelina (Angie ) Scarth-Johnson 139 40
197 Iva Vejmolová 156 53
209 Jessica Pilz 163 53
242 Daria Brylova 160 53
247 Hannah Schubert 158 48
274 Alex Totkova 140 40
276 Aleksandra Taistra 159 48
291 Martina Cufar Potard 168 58
309 Tanja Emsperger 163 53
338 Agata Wisniewska 165 48
345 Taylor Vanessa 158 48
357 Raffaella Cottalorda 151 43
412 Francesca Medici 164 48
418 Frederike Förster 160 48
419 Audrey Sniezek 157 48
422 Marine Girardet 162 48
426 Oriane Bertone 140 40
432 Solène Amoros 172 58
437 Jillian Sompel 158 53
439 Teresa Troya 167 53
465 Maja Rudka 165 48
477 Céline Fergeau 159 48
482 Maria Sperl 153 48
494 Alex Gonzalez 170 58
499 Heather Weidner 170 48
513 Ana Ogrinc 176 58
515 Chaehyeon Seo 160 48
519 Karolina Ośka 178 58
532 Ana Senegacnik Kurnik 170 58
533 Anja ŠErbinek 162 48
539 Ema Seliškar 155 43
543 Michaela Drlikova 173 53
548 María López 167 53
565 Stasa Gejo 175 58
566 Marketa Janosova 152 43
576 Roxane Durand 162 53
604 Joanna Niechwiedowicz 163 53
610 Belén Villalón 168 53
696 Sylvie Moya 163 53
703 Jasna Hodžić 164 53
768 Olga Fedyuk 169 53
825 Julia Pfanzelt 178 58
839 Céline Le Dily 170 58
854 Michaela Smetanová 156 43
858 Lucija Tarkuš 156 43
877 Anna Gallyamova 170 53
895 Katie Lambert 152 43
896 La Claudietta 160 48
934 Amanda Berezowski 163 48
965 Petra Zupan 172 58
984 Martyna Szymańska 145 40
985 Tereza Širůčková 150 43
1020 Frances Bensley 165 53
1025 Anna Manzoni 155 43
1035 Jennifer Wood 167 53
1036 Larissa Arce 167 48

What Does This Tell Us?

Well, it seems clear that in order to be a top-flight climber, height just isn’t that much of a factor. It’s entirely possible to climb at mind bendingly strong grades, irrespective of your height.

If any thing, being slightly shorter than average is of benefit, as it doesn’t effect reach too significantly, but does have a positive impact on weight.

What is clear, when looking at the data is that most of the climbers in these groups are light…and I mean, really light!

For example, the legend Adam Ondra is a tall guy at 185 cm, taller than me, but weighs only 68 kg. I’m erm…a little heavier than that, (cough 20 kg).

A stiff breeze and he’d be airborne.

Power to Weight Is Critical

Something that did stand out from the data was the relationship between rank and height. There was a correlation between an increase in height and an increase in rank (rank getting worse).

This is the same for height and weight, which could lead one to argue that as you get taller, it’s harder to get lighter and so on average, this has an impact on your ability to climb at the very highest grade.



Why Do Taller People Seem Like They Have an Advantage?

My suspicion is that in the early years of ones climbing career, the inherent strength and reach advantage of taller people, coupled with the more vertical routes that are typically climbed means that taller people are generally at an advantage.

But as they progress into the intermediate grades and beyond, their smaller, lighter counterparts adapt their techniques, developer their strength and are then able to capitalise on their naturally smaller frames.

Of course, this all depends on what route you’re on. Some routes will naturally be easier for someone of a smaller stature, whilst others will be easier for our tall friends.

Where Should a Shorter Climber Focus Their Training

So, if you are in the more vertically challenged category, you’re not at an inherent disadvantage, you just need to adapt your style and keep on training.

Here’s a few areas to focus on that may help.

  1. Flexibility – Working on your flexibility will ensure that you maximise you reach as much as possible. Practising yoga or something similar is a great way to improve this. It can also help with balance and core stability, key skills for improving your climbing.
  2. Dynamic Moves – As a smaller climber, you’re going to have to make more dynamic moves than someone who can statically reach for a hold. Practising dead-points and explosive dynamic moves on easier ground will help you learn the movement and body awareness needed to latch those dynos when it counts.
  3. Improved Footwork – Work on spotting those intermediate foot holds, sneaky smears, hidden heel hooks or elusive egyptians maybe the missing move holding you back from glory. Plus, you’ll look awesome doing them.

In all truth, many of us climb so far below our genetic limit that we need to realise that it’s not our height that’s holding us back.

Focusing on getting stronger, fitter and technically better are going to have a much bigger impact on our climbing.

So, keep cranking and don’t let your height hold you back.

Related posts

Backpacking Trip E-Books – The Big Outside – GWC Mag

‘HomeBase’ for Any Adventure Vehicle – GWC Mag

Deep-Sea Life Bonanza Discovered off Easter Island » Explorersweb – GWC Mag