Plans to get an entire block off the natural gas system take shape in one California city – GWC Mag

by gwcmag
32 views
A+A-
Reset

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Underfoot in our cities lies a mammoth network of natural gas pipelines, delivering to millions of homes and businesses a fossil fuel that, when burned, emits planet-warming gases into the atmosphere.

In one small California city, plans are afoot to pare back this system: Albany, in the San Francisco Bay Area, wants to electrify an entire city block so that it can shut down its gas line — for good. It has the blessing of the U.S. Department of Energy, which last month awarded the project a $200,000 grant from its Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant program.

“We really hope this can help lay the groundwork for [gas system] decommissioning on a much wider scale,” Albany Community Development Analyst Michelle Plouse said. She is not aware of any other U.S. cities that have tested the concept at scale.

Suspending service to a portion of the gas pipeline is an emerging approach to building decarbonization, explained Claire Halbrook, director at Gridworks, an organization that facilitates grid decarbonization efforts. With funding from the California Energy Commission, Gridworks is researching the role gas system decommissioning could play in a managed energy transition. 

When coupled with “targeted electrification” of all buildings in an area, this intentional, systemic approach aims to counter unintended consequences of one-building-at-a-time electrification efforts: If gas companies lose eager-to-electrify customers but still spend the same on maintaining gas infrastructure, the remaining customers may be left to foot the bill. Those unlucky remaining gas customers won’t be random, Plouse and Halbrook warn — they’ll likely be the residents least able to afford to electrify their buildings.

“We really want to protect our low-income customers and renters from having to pay for the gas system simply because they can’t afford to switch to alternative [energy] sources,” Halbrook said. In addition to having equity benefits, targeted electrification may also be more cost-effective and technically efficient for utilities and building owners, Plouse said. “There are lots of places with 10 houses in a row that are all the same model. We could just do the same thing on all those houses, potentially.”

Gas system decommissioning can help utilities avoid spending money on repairs or replacements in parts of the system that few customers will use, Halbrook said. “Don’t keep investing in a system that, every time you make a decision, has a 60-year life attached to it,” she said.

The concept is gaining traction in states nationwide, but sizable implementation is primarily happening in California, Halbrook said. More pilots like Albany’s are in the works: A June report by Gridworks and its project partners detailed their selection of proposed pilot sites for gas system decommissioning and development of community engagement plans. The team pointed to potential sites in the Bay Area communities of Oakland and San Leandro.

What will it take to get a city block to ‘yes’?

Plouse gave kudos to Pacific Gas & Electric, the combined gas and electric utility that serves Albany, for moving the city’s project along. The utility helped Albany identify potential city blocks where decommissioning the gas line makes the most sense because it is up for repairs in the coming years. The line would be simply left in the ground and capped, Plouse said.

“We wouldn’t be anywhere near where we are right now without [PG&E],” she said. When it comes to this project, Albany has the advantage of being very small — about one and a half square miles, she noted. “It’s all very human scale,” she said. “We were actually able to get a map and just look at all the gas lines.”

PG&E has a track record of advancing gas system decommissioning research, said Halbrook, who used to work at the utility. “They were the first combined gas and electric utility to support policies limiting expansion of the gas system and to pursue these targeted electrification projects,” she said. “The reason for that is that you have a fiduciary responsibility to your shareholders, and if they are making an investment that you think there is a high possibility that they might not be able to recover some or all of it, you have a responsibility to act.”

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Join Our Eco-Community

Stay updated on verified green brands and exclusive eco-innovations. Sign up below.

[mc4wp_form id=115562]

Let’s grow the green economy together.

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00