Q&A: The Latest in the Battle Over Plastic Bag Bans – GWC Mag

From our collaborating partner “Living on Earth,” public radio’s environmental news magazine, an interview by host Paloma Beltran with Judith Enck, former EPA Regional Administrator and president of Beyond Plastics. 

A decade ago, California became the first U.S. state to ban single-use plastic bags, and eleven states as well as some territories followed suit. But some 18 other states have gone in the opposite direction and even blocked local cities and towns from prohibiting single use plastic bags.

Now, Florida appears ready to join them, with a proposed statewide measure to bar local cities and towns from banning single-use plastic items.

Against that trend there is now a proposal in California to update its pioneering law and eliminate loopholes that have apparently led to more plastic waste, not less. 

Judith Enck, former EPA Regional Administrator and president of Beyond Plastics, spoke with Living on Earth about the battle over bag bans—and how to get them right. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

PALOMA BELTRAN: Legislators in California are trying to correct or fix legislation from 2014 that banned single-use plastic bags in the state. What was the substance of that original legislation, and in what ways did it not turn out as planned?

JUDITH ENCK: Well, the public is really tired of seeing plastic bags everywhere in our communities. You look up in trees, you see plastic bags, you see it littered at beaches and parks. And so the state of California actually went first and passed a statewide ban to prohibit supermarkets and retail stores from handing out single-use plastic bags. Because they went first, they didn’t have the benefit of knowing about mistakes in drafting the law. And unfortunately, they made a mistake, and they only banned thin film bags. And then the response from supermarkets and plastic bag makers were to then sell thicker single-use plastic bags, and kind of mislead the public and try to get people to think that these were actually reusable bags when most of them really weren’t. 

So in fact, it made the status quo worse. We went from millions of thin plastic bags to millions of thick plastic bags that were typically only used once or twice. Thankfully, California lawmakers recognized that the original plastic bag ban is not working well at all, so they’ve introduced a bill to fix it and not have it just say that they’re banning thin film plastic bags, but all plastic bags, and that’s the common sense way to approach it. That’s what the state of New York and other states have done.

You mentioned New York. What are some of the states that have made progress on plastic bag pollution, and that California might look up to as a model?

I would look to New York and New Jersey as good models to reduce plastic bag pollution. The New York law bans all plastic bags at retail checkouts, full stop. You’re not supposed to be receiving any kind of plastic bag whatsoever. And in New Jersey, we have that same law. 

But New Jersey went a step even further to promote reusable bags, by also banning paper bags at the checkout, which was a surprise. That initiative actually came from the supermarket companies. They opposed the original plastic bag ban. 

Once they saw that New Jersey lawmakers were going to pass it into law, they were worried that many consumers might not bring reusable bags and would ask for paper bags, which are more expensive than plastic bags. In a twist, the supermarket lobby said, don’t just ban plastic bags—if you’re going to do that, ban paper bags as well. And that is the law in New Jersey. You’ve seen a very significant shift toward consumers consistently bringing their own reusable bags to the store.

What has been the plastic industry’s response to these plastic bag bans?

Oh, the plastic industry always opposes these plastic bag bans, or they try to make them weaker. The other thing they’ve done in some states is [promote] state laws prohibiting local governments from banning plastic bags. It’s always interesting to watch the trajectory toward when you get a statewide plastic bag ban. It often happens first at the city or municipal level, and then it trickles up to the state level. And whether it’s your city council, or your state legislature, if they have proposed anything to reduce plastic bag pollution, the plastics industry shows up in force fighting these proposals. 

The excuse they use about why we shouldn’t ban plastic bags is they say we can just recycle plastic bags. But plastic bag recycling has been an abysmal failure. There have been some journalism projects whereby little electronic trackers were put inside plastic bags that you drop off in your supermarket recycling bin, and oftentimes the plastic bags are tracked to landfills or incinerators. I’m really losing confidence in any ability to recycle single-use plastic bags. 

Once states adopt these laws, using reusable bags just becomes second nature. So it’s just a matter of passing a good law—no loopholes like the California law, strict enforcement. And we save literally hundreds of millions of plastic bags in states every single year.

Speaking of local decision making on plastic issues, in Florida, the state legislature is working on a law known as “ban on bans” that will impact local decision making on plastic issues. Can you tell me more about that?

Yes. This is a very sinister move by the plastics industry. 

They know that the public is tired of seeing plastic litter all over communities, entering rivers and the ocean, affecting our own health. There’s a real interesting and strong grassroots movement to reduce plastics, for many reasons—climate change reasons, environmental justice reasons, health reasons and a realization that plastic recycling mostly doesn’t work. 

At the local level, many volunteers come together, they petition their city council or their county government. They want to adopt a local plastic bag ban, or perhaps a ban on polystyrene foam food containers. Another popular move is something called “skip the stuff,” so when you order takeout food, you don’t automatically get all the plastic utensils and condiments and straws. 

We’re seeing this growing movement against plastic pollution all over the country. So the reaction by some state legislators—at the request of the plastics, chemical and fossil fuel lobbyists—is to adopt what’s called a “ban on bans.” In Florida, they are considering adopting a law that says local communities cannot adopt local laws dealing with plastics. These bans on bans have been adopted in at least 18 states, including states like Texas and Oklahoma. 

They sure seem to be anti-democratic. You have the state government telling local governments they cannot act to protect the environment and health in their communities. It’s a shrewd move. And it’s really unfortunate that state lawmakers and governors are blocking progress at the local level to reduce plastic pollution.