Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property Penci_AMP_Post_Template::$ID is deprecated in /home/u444474283/domains/gwcmag.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/penci-soledad-amp/includes/class-amp-post-template.php on line 46

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property Penci_AMP_Post_Template::$post is deprecated in /home/u444474283/domains/gwcmag.com/public_html/wp-content/plugins/penci-soledad-amp/includes/class-amp-post-template.php on line 47
What Caused The Reduction In Breast Cancer Mortality Since 1975? – Healthcare Economist - GWC Mag - Your Trusted Source For Green Technology, Sustainability, And Environmental Innovation What Caused The Reduction In Breast Cancer Mortality Since 1975? – Healthcare Economist - GWC Mag - Your Trusted Source For Green Technology, Sustainability, And Environmental Innovation

What caused the reduction in breast cancer mortality since 1975? – Healthcare Economist – GWC Mag





That is the answer Caswell-Jin et al. (2024) aim to answer. The authors used 4 cancer mortality models within CISNET for this study:

  • Model D (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute). Used to define a set of disease states and implemented analytic formulations to estimate the association of interventions on transitions between these states, as well as on breast cancer incidence and mortality.
  • Model M (MD Anderson Cancer Center). Relied on a a bayesian approach, which asseded the probability distributions for unknown parameters, including treatment benefits, and fitting to observed breast cancer mortality
  • model S (Stanford University). A microsimulation that modelled natural history of disease based on tumor size and stage progression mapped to detection; treatments benefits were applied to baseline survival curves based on stage, age, and estrogen receptor (ER)/ERBB2 (formerly HER2) status at detection.
  • model W (University of Wisconsin–Harvard). This model used a tumor growth framework and was calibrated incidence and mortality based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) registry. This model also incorporated a cure fraction.

Categories of breast cancer by ER/ERBB2 status (ER+/ERBB2−, ER+/ERBB2+, ER/ERBB2+, and ER/ERBB2−) were modelled separately.

Using this approach, the authors found that:

The breast cancer mortality rate in the US (age adjusted) was 48/100 000 women in 1975 and 27/100 000 women in 2019. In 2019, the combination of screening, stage I to III treatment, and metastatic treatment was associated with a 58% reduction (model range, 55%-61%) in breast cancer mortality. Of this reduction, 29% (model range, 19%-33%) was associated with treatment of metastatic breast cancer, 47% (model range, 35%-60%) with treatment of stage I to III breast cancer, and 25% (model range, 21%-33%) with mammography screening. Based on simulations, the greatest change in survival after metastatic recurrence occurred between 2000 and 2019, from 1.9 years (model range, 1.0-2.7 years) to 3.2 years (model range, 2.0-4.9 years).

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2813878

You can read the full paper here.



Related posts

Gossiping can benefit mental health, but also presents risks, experts say – GWC Mag

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) earnings Q1 2024 – GWC Mag

UnitedHealth says Change Healthcare cyberattack cost it $872 million – GWC Mag