Inside the rise of groundwater-based geothermal heat pumps – GWC Mag

by gwcmag
0 comments

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

A few steps from the front door of Rochester, Minnesota’s city hall, two newly drilled wells plunge hundreds of feet down into a vast, cool aquifer. Rather than supplementing Rochester’s municipal water supplies, these wells will use the groundwater to heat and cool the 85,000-square-foot government building.

Groundwater-based geothermal heat pump systems use electricity more efficiently than air-source systems, Rochester Facilities and Property Manager Scot Ramsey told Facilities Dive. Rochester’s groundwater, which maintains a year-round temperature in the low 50 degrees Fahrenheit, reduces the system’s heat exchange workload and achieves consistent coefficients of performance, or COPs, between 4 and 5, Ramsey said. The COP of a heat pump is typically a ratio of useful heating or cooling provided to the energy required, with higher COPs reflecting higher levels of efficiency. 

Air-source heat pumps have similar COPs in mild weather, but are less efficient and thus have higher operating costs at lower temperatures. Newer, cold-hardened air-source models, however, work even when temperatures are below zero degrees Fahrenheit, as they often are in Minnesota, Ramsey said. 

“Air-source heat pump technology is getting better, but your COP is still going to be 2 or under when it’s really cold,” Ramsey noted.

Less space, more capacity

Ground-source geothermal systems, which tap latent heat in dry bedrock rather than groundwater, are nearly as energy-efficient as groundwater-based systems and operate effectively throughout the year. However, due to the lower efficiency of individual ground-source wells, ground-source systems require a larger number of boreholes, each spaced about 20 feet apart. 

Nevertheless, groundwater systems are more space efficient and have the potential to “unlock an entire market that wants to take advantage of geothermal,”  David Henrich, president of Minnesota-based drilling firm Bergerson Caswell, told Facilities Dive. Bergerson Caswell is a drilling contractor for Darcy Solutions, the geothermal company whose closed-loop technology underpins the Rochester City Hall system. When Darcy representatives approached Henrich about working together a few years ago, “I immediately said, ‘I’m in,’ because I knew the limitations of [ground-source] geothermal,” Henrich said.

Using Darcy’s technology, the Steamfitters and Pipefitters Local 455 union now cools its 100,000 square-foot training facility in St. Paul, Minnesota with just four groundwater wells, according to the St. Paul Union Advocate. A traditional ground-source geothermal system would have required 70 wells on the premises and the temporary closure of its on-site parking lot, the Union Advocate reported.

Minnesota has unusually favorable geology for groundwater-based geothermal heat pumps, Robert Ed, director of marketing and strategy for Darcy Solutions, told Facilities Dive. But the technology can be cost-effective in about 75% of the U.S. landmass,” he noted. 

Economic considerations

Even in places where underground hydrology broadly favors groundwater-based geothermal heat pump systems, conditions can vary from site to site, based on factors like water table depth and bedrock composition.

“The aquifer could be 80 feet underground or 400 feet underground, depending on the local geology,” Ed said. Darcy’s staff hydrogeologists assess site conditions to determine optimal well depth, which is important because the system’s heat exchanger and groundwater pump must be immersed in the aquifer, he added. 

The actual task of drilling the wells and placing the underground equipment requires larger equipment and special expertise that most water-well drilling companies lack, Ed said. He advises companies considering geothermal systems to scrutinize their drilling contractors. 

Customers also need to understand the economics of ground-source and groundwater-based geothermal heat pumps to determine which type of system is right for them, Henrich said. 

Traditional ground-source geothermal heat pumps make sense for residential and smaller commercial users that need less than 50 tons of thermal capacity, and for larger users with ample space for borefields, like suburban high school and college campuses, Henrich said. It may be the only “ground-coupled” option for users of any size in regions where groundwater conditions can’t support water-based geothermal systems, Henrich noted. 

You may also like

Leave a Comment